A LOAD OF BULL...?

>> Friday, January 27, 2012

A Biased BBC reader contacted me with regard to what he sees is the BBC's biased attitude to the dog owning community. 

The BBC's programme, Death Row Dogs, 24th January has raised several hackles, including complaints from Dr Roger Mugford, an eminent expert on canine behaviour who says:
"The BBC should not have screened this programme because it did not inform, entertain or meet any of the other accepted objectives for public broadcast television. Rather, it mislead the viewer into believing that bull breeds and owners of bull breeds were in some sense inferior to the rest of society. Some of the cases they showed had welfare implications and were not your “average” bull breed owner. They chose not to depict any of the ordinary or more affluent Midlanders who take pride in their Staffordshire Bull Terriers and its numerous cross-bred combinations. Significantly, no dangerous dogs (i.e. Section 3) featured in this BBC film, and this was a massively biased defence of the ill-conceived Section 1 breed specific legislation."
Now, I don't have a dog in this fight myself, but I am always happy to provide a platform to those concerned about BBC bias.

3 comments:

cjhartnett 11:37 AM, January 27, 2012  

So the BBC prefer to highlight selected dogs to promote their own agenda, as well as for effect....like Crufts.
Was losing Barbara Woodhouse the equivalent of losing Robin Day?
In any event, for the BBC to be so Pavlovian in furtherance of their twisted agenda in the canine world is pretty reealing isn`t it?
It`s not as if wel`ll be voting for their choice of hound , so it only goes to show how steeped in "Mitt or Barak" confrontational binary thinking that goes from top to bottom at the BBC.
BBC-been sniffing the Guardian/Labour Partys bottoms, lamposts and leavings since 1979...what a troika!

Geyza 1:00 PM, January 27, 2012  

Whilst I am not a fan of the Kennel club, due to their obnoxious, cruel and sick policy of supporting the breeding in of lethal genetic abnormalities to certain breeds, and I support the BBC in their refusal to show crufts, I will be the first to defend certain healthy breeds.

I have friends who have staffies and the real shame is the reputation that this breed has got due to chavs and dickheads.

Staffies are great, friendly wonderful dogs. Not the vicious breed that some dress them up as.

ian 9:23 PM, January 27, 2012  

Nice bit of beeb propaganda against the white native working class. I expect the effete,  pampered poodles of the corporation sees us all as vicious mongrel lowlifes who should all be put down, and replaced by exotic foreign breeds.

Antony Jay

"But we were not just anti-Macmillan; we were anti-industry, anti-capitalism, anti-advertising, anti-selling, anti-profit, anti-patriotism, anti-monarchy, anti-Empire, anti-police, anti-armed forces, anti-bomb, anti-authority. Almost anything that made the world a freer, safer and more prosperous place, you name it, we were anti it."
Antony Jay, Telegraph, July 2007

Andrew Marr

"..the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."
Andrew Marr, The Guardian Feb. 1999

Jeremy Paxman

"But the bigger question is whether the BBC itself has a future. Working for it has always been a bit like living in Stalin’s Russia, with one five-year-plan, one resoundingly empty slogan after another. One BBC, Making it Happen, Creative Futures, they all blur into one great vacuous blur. I can’t even recall what the current one is. Rather like Stalin’s Russia, they express a belief that the system will go on forever."
Jeremy Paxman, The James McTaggart Memorial, 24th August 2007

Back to TOP