THE SAME SEX MARRIAGE OXYMORON

>> Friday, August 13, 2010

The BBC relentlessly push the Stonewall approved line that homosexual people must be allowed to "marry" in the interests of fairness and "equality". There is such an interview on Today at 8.48am. It's remarkable how the State Broadcaster can blithely dismiss millennia of human experience and instead pursue this radical re-definition of the institute of marriage to accommodate militant gays. It reminds me of the scene from the Life if Brian where Reg (played by Eric Idle) gets upset because he can't have babies. His comrades decide that he has the right to have a baby and all are content. That's exactly where the BBC are and where they demand we must be. It goes without saying that the suggestion that marriage is the union between one man and one women infuriates the BBC. You can guess why.

8 comments:

hippiepooter 10:52 AM, August 13, 2010  

Homosexual marriage and homosexual adoption are just propaganda stunts to normalise perversion.

Statistically it is accepted that men are far more likely to sexually abuse children than woman, but there seems to be very little research in the public domain on the breakdown of these figures in relation to heterosexual and homosexual men.  Where these figures do exist, such as those brought to light by the Vatican over child sex abuse by priests, we see a very disproportionate preponderance of homosexual paedophilia.

The BBC would far rather promote homosexualist propaganda than look objectively at the figures available.  As in Islington Council in the 80's and 90's, political correctness comes first and and the welfare of children nowhere.

hippiepooter 10:56 AM, August 13, 2010  

<span>Homosexual marriage and homosexual adoption are just propaganda stunts to normalise perversion. 
 
Statistically it is accepted that men are far more likely to sexually abuse children than women, but there seems to be very little research in the public domain on the breakdown of these figures in relation to heterosexual and homosexual men.  Where these figures do exist, such as those brought to light by the Vatican over child sex abuse by priests, we see a high preponderance of homosexual paedophilia. 
 
The BBC would far rather promote homosexualist propaganda than look objectively at the figures available.  As in Islington Council in the 80's and 90's, political correctness comes first and and the welfare of children nowhere.</span>

Martin 11:34 AM, August 13, 2010  

As I've commented before the BBC promotes homosexual marriage at every opportunity it gets, yet the BBC would NEVER in a million years promote heterosexual marriage in the same way (unless it's Muslim forced marriage)

George R 11:46 AM, August 13, 2010  

Yes, the BBC promotes its homosexuality everywhere: in UK, in California, everywhere.

It seems as though BBC 'Today' dropped its scheduled item for 8:48 this morning; perhaps you are having some effect, David.

BBC 'Today' revised schedule:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8910000/8910447.stm

George R 11:57 AM, August 13, 2010  

'The Rights of Man' blog:
"The Feminist Worldview at the BBC"

http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2010/08/the-feminist-worldview-at-the-bbc.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+co%2FeFCe+%28The+Rights+Of+Man%29


The BBC's 'feminist worldview' also, I would say, includes this:

Why have Western feminists been so muted in their criticisms of Iran?

Rueful Red 12:00 PM, August 13, 2010  

George R:

Good heavens, it's gone right down the memory hole!

Millie Tant 2:38 PM, August 13, 2010  

I posted on your other thread about the contradictions and absurdities in the homosexuals' positions re marriage. They can blooming well marry but they don't want to. First they want no truck with it. Then they do or pretend they do because they want to be able to parody it with a simulacrum. (God knows why.) 
It's about as sensible as starting a campaign saying I want nothing to do with physics, chemistry and maths but I demand a "degree" in science and if you don't give me one, I will scream and shout cos it's not fairrrrr!!!! It's not eeeeeeeeeeeeequal!

Grant 9:31 AM, August 14, 2010  

You mean like BBC "science correspondents"  ;)  

Antony Jay

"But we were not just anti-Macmillan; we were anti-industry, anti-capitalism, anti-advertising, anti-selling, anti-profit, anti-patriotism, anti-monarchy, anti-Empire, anti-police, anti-armed forces, anti-bomb, anti-authority. Almost anything that made the world a freer, safer and more prosperous place, you name it, we were anti it."
Antony Jay, Telegraph, July 2007

Andrew Marr

"..the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."
Andrew Marr, The Guardian Feb. 1999

Jeremy Paxman

"But the bigger question is whether the BBC itself has a future. Working for it has always been a bit like living in Stalin’s Russia, with one five-year-plan, one resoundingly empty slogan after another. One BBC, Making it Happen, Creative Futures, they all blur into one great vacuous blur. I can’t even recall what the current one is. Rather like Stalin’s Russia, they express a belief that the system will go on forever."
Jeremy Paxman, The James McTaggart Memorial, 24th August 2007

Back to TOP