By Their Friends Ye Shall (Not) Know Them

>> Saturday, December 12, 2009

Every time that the Conservatives are mentioned in regards to the European Parliament, for example, BBC reporters dust off the Labour briefing sheet about their political allies despite those slurs having been extensively debunked elsewhere. So you'd think that, for the sake of balance, when a party allied to Labour from EU aspirant Turkey is banned for consorting with terrorists, that might mention a small paragraph towards the end of the BBC article?

Deputies from Turkey’s main Kurdish party have said today they will quit their parliament after the group was banned by the Constitutional Court. The court voted on Friday to disband the Democratic Society Party (DTP), finding it guilty of cooperating with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) separatist guerrillas.

It's so strange that there isn't a single mention in the BBC article that these are Labour’s Turkish buddies. If it'd been any of the Tories' mates banned for consorting with terrorists it would have been a very different story.

7 comments:

Martin 4:08 PM, December 12, 2009  

The BBc loves Liebour and the EU (both give it loads of money). The BBC hates the Tories.

Enough said really.

All Seeing Eye 4:11 PM, December 12, 2009  

Can't really argue with that summary, to be fair.

George R 4:15 PM, December 12, 2009  

The following passes by the BBC's pro-Turkey/EU politics:


http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/12/headquarters-of-turkeys-efforts-to-join-eu-in-building-seized-from-orthodox-church.html

Craig 5:30 PM, December 12, 2009  

Very true. It's got well beyond a joke now.

NotaSheep 7:17 PM, December 12, 2009  

We all agree it happens, we all agree it';s wrong, we all fulminate about here and on other blogs. However what can we do about it?

Marky 5:05 AM, December 13, 2009  

There's really only one other thing that will make any difference, civil disobedience. In the case of the BBC this means not paying the licence fee with all that it entails.

Enzo 4:02 PM, December 13, 2009  

i think nhe feels the game is up, and also let down by his 'buddies,' who promised him his presdency and then didn't deliver.

i wonder if he is running the gauntlet? surely he knows better than to cross his pay masters, surely he isn't holding them to disclosure ransom?

i don't think he is, but he's definately not playing their game right now, and i recon that is because he is pissed that his ass isn't in the el euro presidente chair.

He realises that he's been screwed over by the reppies, and is now looking for redemption.

Antony Jay

"But we were not just anti-Macmillan; we were anti-industry, anti-capitalism, anti-advertising, anti-selling, anti-profit, anti-patriotism, anti-monarchy, anti-Empire, anti-police, anti-armed forces, anti-bomb, anti-authority. Almost anything that made the world a freer, safer and more prosperous place, you name it, we were anti it."
Antony Jay, Telegraph, July 2007

Andrew Marr

"..the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."
Andrew Marr, The Guardian Feb. 1999

Jeremy Paxman

"But the bigger question is whether the BBC itself has a future. Working for it has always been a bit like living in Stalin’s Russia, with one five-year-plan, one resoundingly empty slogan after another. One BBC, Making it Happen, Creative Futures, they all blur into one great vacuous blur. I can’t even recall what the current one is. Rather like Stalin’s Russia, they express a belief that the system will go on forever."
Jeremy Paxman, The James McTaggart Memorial, 24th August 2007

Back to TOP