HE'S THE ONE...

>> Friday, October 09, 2009

So, Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace Price. The BBC coverage here is interesting insofar as even the BBC is forced to fess up that of the thousands of those who have contacted the BBC, 75% have expressed "surprise". (Though "world leaders" welcome it) I'll say. My small point is that the BBC makes reference to this award being surprising after his "less than a year in power" period. Erm, bit more than that. The final date for nominations for the Nobel Prize was a mere TWO WEEKS after Obama ascended to high office which means it took just 14 days to carry out "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples". Hope the BBC make that point clearly since it is pertinent to the quality of the decision. I also enjoy the way the BBC reports the Taliban perspective so ensuring that those of us who think him not worthy are cast into the same rhetorical camp as Islamist killers.

18 comments:

Asuka Langley Soryu 4:31 PM, October 09, 2009  

That's how powerful He is. It only took Him 13 days to make everything awwwwwwright. And thank God He did. Having everything, everywhere perfectly perfect is the best thing ever.

Martin 4:40 PM, October 09, 2009  

Even the BBC seem embarassed for him, bless! I know things are crazy when I'm agreeing with Jeremy Bowen and the Taliban!!!!

Philip 4:56 PM, October 09, 2009  

I read the best line at the Spectator today:

"The prize that Ghandi didn't get but Arafat did..."

Heads on poles 5:04 PM, October 09, 2009  

Is it 'cos I is ......   insert whatever you want here!

D B 5:39 PM, October 09, 2009  

If you really want to turn your stomach, go to Twitter and search "Obama" and "John Lennon" together. The number of morons who think there's something meaningful in Obama getting the Nobel prize on Lennon's birthday is staggering (including Zachary Winner, of Winner and Associates, pro-Obama astroturfers)

Doug 6:00 PM, October 09, 2009  

Have you seen that the Guardian has been caught red handed Jew bashing? They posted a list of all Nobel Peace Prize winners but with the curious removal of all the Jewish winners. The Jewish Chronicle noticed and blogged about. The Guardian claimed they just copied the list from the Nobel site but a quick look of the Nobel site clearly reveals that their list contsin all the Jewish winners.

http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2009/10/nobel-prize-winners.html

Jack Bauer 6:29 PM, October 09, 2009  

'I don't feel I deserve to be in the company of other winners.'"  Papa Doc Obama

Like the child-molester slash terrorist slash child killer Yassir Arafat -- may he rot in hell.

Nice company Barack.

Jack Bauer 6:39 PM, October 09, 2009  

I know. It's amazing. Especially when you consider the stiff competition he faced while the Norwegian Wing of Eurotrash Central deliberated.
Also on the Shortlist were luminaries like...

HUGO CHAVEZ

FIDEL or RAUL CASTRO (depending on which one was STILL alive)

THAT CREEPY DUDE WHO RUNS NORTH KOREA

REVERAND JEREMIAH WRIGHT

TONY BLAIR

John Horne Tooke 7:12 PM, October 09, 2009  

I suspect Alfred Nobel is spinning in his grave - the Nobel peace prizes have become a joke. The prize now has no value whatsoever. (if it ever did).

Martin 7:13 PM, October 09, 2009  

So can I win the Nobel prize for Physics if I think I might find the "god particle" in a few years, perhaps?

Jack Bauer 7:30 PM, October 09, 2009  

Martin -- nice try. But I'm sure the all-seeing Obama will solve that thorny problem before any mere mortal

D B 8:28 PM, October 09, 2009  

Staunch support on Any Questions for the Obama peace prize by... William "Kool Aid" Hague.

UKIP for me at the general election.

Asuka Langley Soryu 8:41 PM, October 09, 2009  

It's a brave new world.

Martin 9:41 PM, October 09, 2009  

I hear Barry does a trick involving some starving people and a few fish!

NotaSheep 10:02 PM, October 09, 2009  

Even the BBC seemed a little embrassed that their hero received this award.

Tarquin 4:19 AM, October 10, 2009  

Nice use of weasel words there ('even the BBC') - as for your point that they missed the nomination date, they quite clearly mentioned it:

"Instead the committee chose Mr Obama, who was inaugurated less than two weeks before the 1 February nomination deadline."

cassandra king 5:53 AM, October 10, 2009  

I wonder who nominated him?

If nominations closed a bare couple of weeks after he took office it certainly begs the questions of 'who/when/why' doesnt it?
I would like to know just WHEN he was nominated and by WHO, answer these questions and things would become a lot clearer.

John Horne Tooke 12:11 AM, October 11, 2009  

1.      Members of national assemblies and governments of states;
2.     Members of international courts;
3.     University rectors; professors of social sciences, history, philosophy, law and theology; directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy institutes;
4.     Persons who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize;
5.     Board members of organizations who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize;
6.     Active and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee; (proposals by members of the Committee to be submitted no later than at the first meeting of the Committee after February 1) and
7.     Former advisers appointed by the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
http://nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/nominators.html

Antony Jay

"But we were not just anti-Macmillan; we were anti-industry, anti-capitalism, anti-advertising, anti-selling, anti-profit, anti-patriotism, anti-monarchy, anti-Empire, anti-police, anti-armed forces, anti-bomb, anti-authority. Almost anything that made the world a freer, safer and more prosperous place, you name it, we were anti it."
Antony Jay, Telegraph, July 2007

Andrew Marr

"..the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."
Andrew Marr, The Guardian Feb. 1999

Jeremy Paxman

"But the bigger question is whether the BBC itself has a future. Working for it has always been a bit like living in Stalin’s Russia, with one five-year-plan, one resoundingly empty slogan after another. One BBC, Making it Happen, Creative Futures, they all blur into one great vacuous blur. I can’t even recall what the current one is. Rather like Stalin’s Russia, they express a belief that the system will go on forever."
Jeremy Paxman, The James McTaggart Memorial, 24th August 2007

Back to TOP